Payments in Full

Payments in Full

Bilt Card 2.0 is more complex

Does it earn a profit now?

Andrew M. Dresner's avatar
Andrew M. Dresner
Jan 21, 2026
∙ Paid

Introduction

The new Bilt card made news twice last week:

  • They announced a new rewards proposition that rewards both Rent payments and Mortgage payments

  • They announced a 10% cap on APRs for 2026

The prior Bilt Card was issued by Wells Fargo. Wells terminated the deal because it was a money loser. A WSJ article detailed the reasons why:

  • Many cardholders primarily paid rent with the card, where Wells didn’t make money

  • Cardholders rarely revolved, so spread income didn’t offset losses on spend

  • Nominal spend qualified cardholders to get Rent rewards, so there was no incentive to make the card primary

The WSJ article claimed the program lost Wells $10M per month. The bank terminated the relationship and Bilt found new partners:

  • Cardless for card processing

  • Column Bank for balance sheet and BIN-sponsorship

This post examines if the new Bilt proposition remediates the flaws that made Wells resign. The situation is similar to the Goldman/Apple/Chase piece I wrote last week – with Wells as Goldman, Bilt as Apple, and Cardless/Column as Chase.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Andrew M. Dresner.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Andrew M. Dresner · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture